Business

Why you shouldn’t rely on MLS photos importance of seeing a home in person

How NRIs can better take care of real estate holdings in India - ENRICHListing photos showcase homes in the best light through staging and editing. But pictures fail to reveal the complete reality. Inspecting in person shows subtleties photos miss. Staging creates an idealized illusion. The lived-in state often differs. Pristine photos depict temporary conditions. Expect some decline from the polished portrayals. 

Editing disguises flaws. Images get altered to mask issues. Don’t blindly trust edited shots. Manipulation hides defects. Problem areas lack photos. Missing pictures signal concealment. Don’t assume absent images equal any issues.  Lenses distort size. Rooms feel smaller in reality. Edits omit context to judge dimensions. Verify room sizes firsthand. Photos exaggerate usable space. Photos conceal home conditions. Damage stays imperceptible in photos. Only direct evaluation reveals the condition.

No substitutes exist for in-person visits. Staging and editing provide an idealized vision. A NYC MLS genuine perspective of value requires being there. Commit based on real-life experience, not pixels. Staged homes feature fresh décor. New furniture gets installed. Decluttering happens. Personal items get removed. Lighting and ambiance get enhanced. Staging presents homes ideally. Expect real life to differ.

Ideal photos capture temporary conditions. The lawns and landscaping are manicured. No damage or clutter exists. The furnishings are pristine. Flaws stay concealed. The rooms look show ready. Don’t assume ideal photos reflect reality long-term.  Editing conceals flaws. Images get cropped to omit ugly areas. Colors get corrected to minimize stains. Filters hide surface flaws. Adjustments conceal damage. Cloning eliminates cracks and holes. 

Wide lenses enlarge spaces in photos. Rooms likely feel smaller in reality. Edited shots provide no context to judge actual dimensions. Always verify room sizes and layouts in person. Photos tend to exaggerate usable space. Pretty photos conceal home conditions. Structural issues stay imperceptible. The dated state of fixtures and surfaces remains obscured. Poor workmanship stays hidden. Wear and tear stays concealed. Smells and sounds go undetected. Photos fail to convey critical conditions. Only direct evaluation reveals the actual condition. Staging, editing, and photography provide an idealized home vision. But a genuine value perspective requires experiencing a home first-hand. The only way to understand if a home meets your needs is an in-person visit. Don’t rely solely on MLS photos. Insist on a real-life showing for the full picture. Shortcuts lead to surprises. Make the extra effort to confidently find the right home.

Strategic shooting highlights home features. Photos focus on selling points. Unappealing areas get minimized. Minor flaws stay imperceptible. Photos spotlight spaces advantageously. Glossy photos depict pristine settings. Images exclude normal wear. Small damages get overlooked. The furnishings appear flawless. Imperfections vanish mysteriously. 

Edits enhance photo appeal. Cropping removes ugly spots. Color fixes downplay stains. Filtering conceals surface flaws. Brightness hides blemishes. Cloning eliminates cracks. Don’t take edited photos at face value. Missing pictures prompt questions. Why did some rooms not get photographed? What do sellers want to hide? Assume absent photos signal issues are purposely excluded. Wide-angle lenses distort proportions. Rooms seem larger in photos. Tight shots provide no scale references. Carefully examine room dimensions in all photos. Expect smaller actual sizes.

Antonio Carter
Emily Carter: Emily, a trained environmental journalist, brings a wealth of expertise to her blog posts on environmental news and climate change. Her engaging style and fact-checked reporting make her a respected voice in environmental journalism.